top of page

Editorial The Hindu: Different approaches to AI regulation

The Race to Regulate AI: A Look at Global Developments

The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving, and governments around the world are scrambling to keep pace with regulations. This summary dives into recent developments in AI regulation across the globe, highlighting the key concerns and approaches.

Global Recognition of AI Risks

The United Nations (UN) Resolution on Artificial Intelligence marks a turning point. It acknowledges the potential dangers of AI systems and emphasizes the need for responsible development to achieve the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The resolution stresses that unethical AI use could hinder progress across social, environmental, and economic aspects of the SDGs.

A crucial concern is the potential impact of AI on jobs, particularly in developing countries with vulnerable labor markets. Small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) could also be negatively affected by automation powered by AI.

National Regulations Emerge: -

Several countries have taken the initiative to establish their own AI regulations:

  • The EU AI Act: This landmark legislation implements a risk-based approach, categorizing AI systems (unacceptable, high, limited, minimal risk) and prescribing corresponding guidelines. The Act bans certain applications deemed too risky, such as those manipulating human behavior or enabling mass surveillance. It allows exemptions for law enforcement in specific situations but requires prior authorization. The EU Act also grapples with regulating Generative AI systems like ChatGPT and the potential compliance burden on businesses, especially startups.

  • China's Approach: China prioritizes safeguards against potential harm from AI to its national social and economic goals. Their regulations focus on three key areas: content moderation (identifying AI-generated content), data protection (requiring user consent for data processing), and algorithmic governance (ensuring security and ethics in developing and running algorithms).

  • The UK's Soft Law Approach:  In contrast to the EU's stricter legal framework, the UK takes a principled and context-based approach. Their strategy involves mandatory consultations with regulatory bodies to enhance technical expertise and bridge potential gaps in regulations. This "soft law" approach prioritizes flexibility and adaptation.

India's Response: Balancing Growth and Responsibility

India, with its massive consumer base and tech workforce, is a crucial player in the AI landscape. The government has allocated ₹10,300 crore for the India AI mission to foster the AI ecosystem through public-private partnerships and support the startup scene. This includes funding for deploying powerful computing resources and research collaboration.

India faces the challenge of balancing its economic growth ambitions with responsible AI development that aligns with the SDGs. This necessitates utilizing AI for innovative solutions while mitigating potential risks. A gradual, phased approach to regulation seems likely for India to achieve this balance.

The Future of AI Regulation

The global conversation on AI regulation is just beginning. As AI technology continues to evolve, policymakers worldwide will need to adapt and refine their approaches. Collaboration and sharing of best practices will be crucial in ensuring the responsible development and deployment of AI for a better future.

Editorial The Hindu: Different approaches to AI regulation

Editorial The Hindu: Different approaches to AI regulation

25 views0 comments

Recent Posts

Adjournment vs Adjournment Sine die vs Prorogation

Summary of Adjournment Sine Die and Prorogation: Adjournment Sine Die: Meaning: Terminates a session of Parliament for an indefinite period, with no fixed date for reconvening. Authority: Presiding of


bottom of page